What's your take on protein powder?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that enjoys cooking.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
My comment was only based on another post he made (think breakfast?) where he ate 5 eggs - so if 1 egg carries a score of 100% of protein - what is that in gr ?
 
So picton what do you do to protect your kidneys from the 4 x requirement of your proteins in the 5 eggs? I can see increasing with age - I do 2 sometimes even 3, especially since starting at the Y.
The kidney issue.
 
The kidney issue according to ?

Here's Lane Norton who wrote his thesis on protein and is a leading physician when it comes to athletic performance, where in the literature if any demographic would have any problem digesting protein and end up with kidney problems would be bodybuilders, which in the literature show no difference than the general public. Again it's where truth doesn't care about our feelings.

Wheat contains antinutrients like phytic acidhttps://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/layne38.htm

Conclusion​

Much of this evidence I have presented not only contradicts the statement that high protein diets are unsafe, but supports high protein diets in the prevention/treatment of heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Those are three of the world's biggest killers, and a high protein diet may be the key to reducing the incidence of all of them!

Perhaps the American Heart Association and the rest of the high protein naysayers would be best served to get the facts first, rather than making statements with little to no scientific support. So next time someone tells you that a high protein diet is bad for you, slide this article on over to them, then sit back and enjoy your next high protein meal.
 
Last edited:
LOL - it just that you wrote "For example an egg has a score of 1.0 (100%)"
I guess I assumed that meant 100% of the protein needed for the 'average' person.
You misunderstood. Here's the complete context - he was referring to the digestibility of the protein in eggs being 100%, not the amount of protein someone needs.

"The highest PDCASS score is 1.0 which indicates the amino acid profile and digestibility it provides is 100%. For example an egg has a score of 1.0 (100%) vs wheat for example which has a score anywhere from 42 to 50, both the amino acid profile and it's digestibility value is about half as much as an egg."
 
You misunderstood. Here's the complete context - he was referring to the digestibility of the protein in eggs being 100%, not the amount of protein someone needs.

"The highest PDCASS score is 1.0 which indicates the amino acid profile and digestibility it provides is 100%. For example an egg has a score of 1.0 (100%) vs wheat for example which has a score anywhere from 42 to 50, both the amino acid profile and it's digestibility value is about half as much as an egg."

Well, I just learned something new. (y)

I knew about varying digestibility of carbs, but not protein.

CD
 
Well, I just learned something new. (y)

I knew about varying digestibility of carbs, but not protein.

CD
And now I learned something new. I didn't know about the varying digestibility of carbs. I was a vegetarian at one time, so I was a lot more concerned about getting enough protein than about getting enough carbs. That was back in the 1970s, so somehow I thought everyone knew that various proteins have different bio-availability.
 
In vegetables and grains (all plant food), they are made up of structure, let's say, cells. When you chew you break down the cells but not all of them. Some people chew more they get more carbs AND protein AND fat the more the food is broken down.
So if you have a whole grain, let's say a cooked wheat berry, you chew it a little, you only get some of the carbs/protein/fat and only some of the calories, but if you chew it much finer (or eat your wheat berries as a flour, bread), you get all the nutrients and calories out of it.
The more finely something is ground up, or like smoothies, the more nutrients are available--but you also break down the fiber AND you get faster higher blood sugar spikes and that's not good either.
 
In vegetables and grains (all plant food), they are made up of structure, let's say, cells. When you chew you break down the cells but not all of them. Some people chew more they get more carbs AND protein AND fat the more the food is broken down.
So if you have a whole grain, let's say a cooked wheat berry, you chew it a little, you only get some of the carbs/protein/fat and only some of the calories, but if you chew it much finer (or eat your wheat berries as a flour, bread), you get all the nutrients and calories out of it.
The more finely something is ground up, or like smoothies, the more nutrients are available--but you also break down the fiber AND you get faster higher blood sugar spikes and that's not good either.
I kinda like the new AI summary of Google search results these days.

AI Overview

Yes, chewing food can increase its bioavailability, or how easily the body absorbs nutrients from it. Chewing breaks down food into smaller particles that are easier to digest, which helps the body absorb nutrients in the intestine. Chewing can also rupture cell walls in plant foods, releasing nutrients that may not have been accessible otherwise. For example, chewing raw or cooked carrots thoroughly can increase the bioavailability of beta-carotene, a nutrient that's important for cell growth. Chewing can also increase the amount of protein the body can absorb from food, which can help build muscle more efficiently.
Apr 5, 2021 — Simply put, 'bioavailability' is the measure of nutrient absorption, i.e how easily a nutrient can be absorbed by our body [1]. Before they can be used for their health benefits/functions, the nutrients we consume first need to be broken down, by our digestive system, into forms that our body can use.
The number of times you should chew food depends on the food. For example, you might chew most bites of food 32 times, but harder foods like steak and nuts might need up to 40 chews per mouthful, while softer foods like watermelon might only need 10–15 chews.
Generative AI is experimental.
To absorb nutrients, your body needs to break food into smaller molecules, like simple sugars and amino acids. So, without proper chewing, you may not absorb nutrients as well. To avoid these risks, chew your food until it becomes soft. This will mean more or less chewing, depending on your food's texture.
 
In vegetables and grains (all plant food), they are made up of structure, let's say, cells. When you chew you break down the cells but not all of them. Some people chew more they get more carbs AND protein AND fat the more the food is broken down.
So if you have a whole grain, let's say a cooked wheat berry, you chew it a little, you only get some of the carbs/protein/fat and only some of the calories, but if you chew it much finer (or eat your wheat berries as a flour, bread), you get all the nutrients and calories out of it.
The more finely something is ground up, or like smoothies, the more nutrients are available--but you also break down the fiber AND you get faster higher blood sugar spikes and that's not good either.
Nice post blissful. Yeah, if a person is prediabetic or diabetic blood sugar spikes should be avoided and really, we should be avoided spikes anyway considering it's a accumulative feature that can take decades to manifest, so keeping blood sugar as stable as possible is a good course of action.

Digestion can be manipulated somewhat and the science bears this out by consuming protein first before consuming carbohydrates, especially refined carbs.

This process is referred to in the sceince literature as TEF. It means the "Thermal Effect of Food" which refers to the energy expenditure associated with the digestion, absorption, and metabolic processing of food. for example protein and vegetables take longer to digest because of their complex nature and have a metabolic value of 25to 30%, in otherwords when consuming 100 calories of protein and veg it takes about 25 to 30 calories just to digest these foods for a net of around 70- 80 calories. Anyway this slower process when consumed first slows the digestion of more simple carbohydrates, basically the protein and the veg are getting in the way of that digestion.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/295901

In a new study, researchers from Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, NY, found that the order in which different types of food are consumed has a significant impact on post-meal glucose and insulin levels in obese people.

When the vegetables and protein were eaten before the carbohydrates, the researchers found that glucose levels were 29%, 37% and 17% lower at the 30, 60 and 120-minute checks, compared with when carbohydrates were consumed first. Also, insulin was found to be significantly lower when the participants ate vegetables and protein first.


Of course this is not something that people normally do and personally it would be very difficult for me personally but just thought it was interesting considering the nature of your post in general. :)
 
Last edited:
However, a protein powder can be a useful addition to your diet if you're into physical fitness or trying to reach specific fitness goals. Just drinking it for no reason doesn't make sense.
 
However, a protein powder can be a useful addition to your diet if you're into physical fitness or trying to reach specific fitness goals. Just drinking it for no reason doesn't make sense.
That's not really true, it helps for sure if someone is looking to increase protein to facilitate fitness goals and not getting it though their food consumption but the same hold true for someone that isn't consuming enough protein to meet their needs in the general sense, which has been discussed throughout this thread. imo
 
Nice post blissful. Yeah, if a person is prediabetic or diabetic blood sugar spikes should be avoided and really, we should be avoided spikes anyway considering it's a accumulative feature that can take decades to manifest, so keeping blood sugar as stable as possible is a good course of action.

Digestion can be manipulated somewhat and the science bears this out by consuming protein first before consuming carbohydrates, especially refined carbs.

This process is referred to in the sceince literature as TEF. It means the "Thermal Effect of Food" which refers to the energy expenditure associated with the digestion, absorption, and metabolic processing of food. for example protein and vegetables take longer to digest because of their complex nature and have a metabolic value of 25to 30%, in otherwords when consuming 100 calories of protein and veg it takes about 25 to 30 calories just to digest these foods for a net of around 70- 80 calories. Anyway this slower process when consumed first slows the digestion of more simple carbohydrates, basically the protein and the veg are getting in the way of that digestion.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/295901

In a new study, researchers from Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, NY, found that the order in which different types of food are consumed has a significant impact on post-meal glucose and insulin levels in obese people.

When the vegetables and protein were eaten before the carbohydrates, the researchers found that glucose levels were 29%, 37% and 17% lower at the 30, 60 and 120-minute checks, compared with when carbohydrates were consumed first. Also, insulin was found to be significantly lower when the participants ate vegetables and protein first.


Of course this is not something that people normally do and personally it would be very difficult for me personally but just thought it was interesting considering the nature of your post in general. :)
This seems to be an excellent argument for starting a meal with a salad. I guess one would want to limit the carbs in the salad dressing and maybe substitute bacon bits for any croutons. ;)
 
Carbs first.... hmmm - remember when you used to go into restaurant and the first thing on the table was the breadsticks and butter or buns and butter? You ate these while waiting for you meal. No wonder restaurant meals help you put on weight and get you into basically bad habits.
 
Carbs first.... hmmm - remember when you used to go into restaurant and the first thing on the table was the breadsticks and butter or buns and butter? You ate these while waiting for you meal. No wonder restaurant meals help you put on weight and get you into basically bad habits.
The second thing is usually a salad, which often came soon after the bread, so it may not be too terrible. I think the crazy amounts of butter and salt in most restaurant meals, as well as the portion sizes, are more to blame for that.
 
People that want to add more vegetables to their diets and not give up any kind of food completely, might like the nutritarian diet. It emphasizes H=N/C Health equals nutrition per calories eaten. So the more nutrition you can take in per calorie the more health you'll have.
Nutritarian-Food-Pyramid-1536x1188.png

From: https://www.plantbasedcooking.com/nutritarian-pyramid/
There's a boatload of information available for free on the internet about it and how nutrition fits the lifestyle.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom