browning like that is cancerous?
i don't think that i asked that already..
This is my take and where legacy media (main stream) emphasizes the "cancer" risk simply because it attracts attention to engage viewers, and pretty much all scientists would say fear mongering.
Cooking food in a dry heat scenario can engage the
Maillard Reaction, which is the browning effect we see on bread, French fries and your chicken breasts and this browning effect can produce
acrylamides which are classified by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) which is a dept within the
WHO organization as a "probable carcinogen"
Probable in the context that animal studies show that cancer does happen from exposure. There are no human studies just animal studies. In all these studies the dose given to these animals is around 20,000% higher than what humans would normally consume, yes not 200% but 20,000%
Another example is glyphosate where quite a few countries have banned it's use entirely which is also shown to be a probably carcinogen by the WHO but again dosage is important and the dosage where glyphosate becomes problematic are dozes that are 5 million to 17 million times higher.
The big fear mongering example is crispy bacon, that is a good one. the dose where the carcinogens start to be problematic are doses that are 100 million times higher, yes, not a mistake so basically either do your own research or take anything you hear from legacy media with a grain of salt.
The WHO also classify "red meat" as a group 2 carcinogen. Not based on animal studies, because animals that are considered meat eaters, no cancer happens, so they use food frequency questionnaires and ask hundreds of thousands to millions of people maybe twice a year for decades and look at how many people got cancer and the group that ate the most red meat had the highest incident of cancers, so they concluded it must have been the red meat. Their particular lifestyle that caused the cancer the WHO actually have no idea because it could be from other lifestyle factors like obesity, heart disease, alcoholism, smoking, or a combination. It's too difficult actually impossible to extrapolate a cause and effect by looking at a questionnaire, but they did anyway, which is much of the type of science they use and why the scientific community doesn't take them very seriously.