About a 1.5 weeks ago I bought a big hunk (about 3.5 lbs, I think it was) of boneless beef bottom round roast since it was on sale for $1.99 / pound. Threw it in the pressure cooker for awhile, maybe 30 minutes, then depressurized it to add potatoes/carrots/cellery and cooked it another 15 or something. Sorry, I don't remember the actual times. I checked the temp of the meat briefly after it was done cooking and it shot up to 200* so I didn't even bother to let the thermometer stabilize - all I know is it was very hot.
It was extremely delicious, and fairly tender. Not falling apart on the fork tender, but I was able to shred it with two forks without too much work.
Fast forward a few days and I want to try to improve this so I buy another one (still on sale). This time I'm thinking about how Alton Brown talked up aging beef on Good Eats, so I stored it in the fridge for 3 days with good circulation. Then I put it in a zip loc baggie for 24 hours with some red wine (about a cup), garlic, bay leaves, and a bit of olive oil (about 1/2 cup).
After that I cooked it in the pressure cooker (with about another cup of red wine) for less time, maybe 20 minutes, and the thermometer reported 160*F which sounded great to me.
The beef was very tasty, with perhaps more yummy beefy flavor than the first time. BUT, it was a serious workout to try and shred it with two forks. I almost bent the forks. I gave up and just ate it with a fork and a knife.
My question to you all is if you would expect the beef to get more or less tender if I had kept cooking it at that point. Should I have let it go as long as the first time? Or is it better to have a temp around 160*F and my problem was just the lost moisture from the aging process? I'm googling around the web but I can't find any clear science to tell me either way.
Thanks!
-Adrian
It was extremely delicious, and fairly tender. Not falling apart on the fork tender, but I was able to shred it with two forks without too much work.
Fast forward a few days and I want to try to improve this so I buy another one (still on sale). This time I'm thinking about how Alton Brown talked up aging beef on Good Eats, so I stored it in the fridge for 3 days with good circulation. Then I put it in a zip loc baggie for 24 hours with some red wine (about a cup), garlic, bay leaves, and a bit of olive oil (about 1/2 cup).
After that I cooked it in the pressure cooker (with about another cup of red wine) for less time, maybe 20 minutes, and the thermometer reported 160*F which sounded great to me.
The beef was very tasty, with perhaps more yummy beefy flavor than the first time. BUT, it was a serious workout to try and shred it with two forks. I almost bent the forks. I gave up and just ate it with a fork and a knife.
My question to you all is if you would expect the beef to get more or less tender if I had kept cooking it at that point. Should I have let it go as long as the first time? Or is it better to have a temp around 160*F and my problem was just the lost moisture from the aging process? I'm googling around the web but I can't find any clear science to tell me either way.
Thanks!
-Adrian