All my cast iron is new. Two are Lodge and on his actually Food Network brand. They are heavy and not as smooth as the old Griswold or Wagner.
I'm not sure what I'm missing because they are "rough" and "heavy". The way I see it, the extra iron that makes my pans relatively heavy are a benefit in that there is more iron to hold heat. Isn't that one of the quoted benefits of CI?
As for the smooth surface, I don't cook eggs in my CI. So what's the benefit of a smoother cooking surface?
What am I missing. Are these differences practical or just nostalgic reminiscences?
Yes, there are trade-offs. I own Lodge, Griswold, Wagner, and Redstone CI. Truth be told, my Lodge pans are just as Non-stick after several years of use, and do retain consistent temperature better than the thinner Griswold, and Wagner pans. The Redstone is a grilling pan, with raised metal ridges designed for high heat searing, and grill marks. All of them work wonderfully. To avoid uneven heating, I use a heat distributing diffuser plate -
https://www.amazon.com/Diffuser-Stove-Electric-Flame-Simmer/dp/B07664Z2MN
Each brand has its strengths and weaknesses.
I was fortunate to find a set of Griswold in multiple sizes when the parents of a co-worker passed on. Not that the deaths were a good thing, but it was their time. In any case, the co-worker who inherited the pans was willing to let them go for $20 per pan. I thought the price was too little, and gave him more per pan, but within my budget.
I believe that Griswold, and Wagner have sentimental value for me, as those were the brands my parents, and grandparents used. My Mom had a huge15 inch Wagner that I would throw into the boat when I, and my best friend would go fishing for a weekend. You couldn't beat it for frying up some spuds, and freshly caught, skinned, and fillets of perch, or bass over a cooking fire.
Seeeeya; Chief Longwind of the North